3 edition of Guidelines for reviewers of geological manuscripts found in the catalog.
Guidelines for reviewers of geological manuscripts
Harold E. Malde
|Statement||by Harold E. Malde ; with a foreword by Wallace R. Hansen and a checklist for reviewing geologic maps by John C. Reed, Jr|
|Series||Open-file report -- 85-610, U.S. Geological Survey open-file report -- 85-610|
|Contributions||Hansen, Wallace R., 1920-, Reed, John Calvin, 1930-, Geological Survey (U.S.)|
|The Physical Object|
Sep 30, · Follow these guidelines when making the individual parts of your paper. All information below comes from the GSA Publications (PDF). Abstract. The abstract should not exceed words, and it should present the general content and conclusions of the paper. Do not include references, criticisms, drawings, or diagrams in the abstract. Units of. Geological Quarterly also publishes book reviews not exceeding words. The authors are requested to propose four possible reviewers for the manuscript (from various countries). Manuscripts submitted to the editors and fulfilling the above editorial requirements will be accepted for publication after a thorough peer-review procedure.
Manuscripts needing revisions must return within 60 days, otherwise, a new submission and review process is required. The reviewers evaluate the submitted manuscripts according to the following criteria: compatibility with the scope and editorial policy of the JGSB - compliance with the submission guidelines (including reference format). GUIDELINES FOR SCIENTIFIC MANUSCRIPT REVIEW Many reviewers find this a helpful guide, particularly if they have not previously reviewed many scientific manuscripts. Don't feel obliged to use the checklist if you have your own technique for analyzing the manuscript's merits. Standards for Original Research Papers.
Ethical Guidelines for SEG Publications. The Society of Exploration Geophysicists serves the advancement of science, industry, and society by publishing journals, meeting abstracts, books, and other publications that present the results of scientific research and ensuing applications. Suggesting / excluding reviewers. Authors are welcome to suggest suitable reviewers and/or request the exclusion of certain individuals when they submit their manuscripts. When suggesting reviewers, authors should make sure they are totally independent and not connected to the work in any way.
Computer analysis of industrial processes data.
Judge Me Not
Man and metals
Individuals, groups and economic behavior
Roots of our future
Shakespeare and the Bible.
Some German spas
Senator from North Carolina
guide to steam plant operation.
Digests and lists pertaining to the development of law and legal institutions in the territories of the United States: 1787-1954
Issues in Malaysian development
Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study.
The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied. erum-c.com: Guidelines for Reviewers of Geological Manuscripts (): Harold E. Malde: Books. Skip to main content. Try Prime Books Go Search EN Hello, Sign in Account & Lists Sign in Account & Lists Orders Try Cited by: 1.
Author Guidelines Manuscript Preparation and Submission. Acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is based on the appraisal of the paper by two or more reviewers and an editor designated by GSA. (Note: Nearly all manuscripts are returned to the author with suggestions for.
At Wiley we believe that peer review is the foundation for safeguarding the quality and integrity of scientific and scholarly research. We want to do everything we can to support reviewers (also sometimes known as "referees") and to recognize their contribution. This is why we’ve created these guidelines.
The Geological Society of London is committed to providing a high-quality and rigorous peer review process. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining these standards and we are grateful for your time and expertise.
These guidelines are for all GSL publications. They are intended to supplement the instructions given in the submission system for each journal/book series and the checklists. Most Guidelines for reviewers of geological manuscripts book are sent out for peer review. The acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is based on the appraisal of the paper by two or more reviewers and the editor.
Review. The editor will solicit reviews of the manuscript from two to three qualified external reviewers. Reviewers are expected to treat the manuscript confidentially. Manuscripts submitted for publication in Bentham Science journals are subjected to single blind peer-review, except for a selected number of patent journals where double blind review is followed.
Single blind reviewing maintains the identity of the reviewers, not disclosing their names to the authors. Guidelines for Reviewers The Responsibility of the Peer Reviewer The peer reviewer is responsible for critically reading and evaluating a manuscript in their specialty field, and then providing respectful, constructive, and honest feedback to authors about their submission.
Bulletin Submission Guidelines If deemed necessary to the review process, these related papers will be copied to reviewers. One author will act as the corresponding author for multi-authored manuscripts.
All authors involved in the work approved the paper and agreed to its submission. All authors must verify their information and. May 25, · How to review manuscripts Your ultimate checklist when reviewing a paper By Darren Sugrue Posted on 25 May As a reviewer, you play a vital role in scholarly publishing.
There are a lot of points to go through and questions to consider as you read through a paper. Respond to the invitation as soon as you can (even if it is to decline) – a delay in your decision slows down the review process and means more waiting for the author. If you do decline the invitation, it would be helpful if you could provide suggestions for alternative reviewers.
The AJA seeks reviews that assess a book’s strengths and weaknesses, as well as locating it within the current field of scholarship. A reviewer’s assessment of the novelty of the author’s argument is often valuable for AJA readers.
It is also helpful if reviewers indicate for which audiences and libraries the book seems appropriate. For all the guidelines and instructions an author needs to prepare a manuscript and any accompanying artwork for editing and production at Yale University Press, see the links below.
Please read the guidelines carefully. If you have further questions, consult your acquisitions editor’s assistant.
Journal Reviewers. At Wiley we believe that peer review is the foundation for safeguarding the quality and integrity of scientific and scholarly research. We want to do everything we can to support reviewers (also sometimes known as "referees") and to recognize their contribution.
This is. GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS OF MANUSCRIPTS THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA BULLETIN (12 June ) Contents PREPARATION OF PAPERS Text Organization Resources for Writing Tools for Writing Word Processors, Font Parts of the Text Tables Tools for Composition Word Processors, Font Table Structure Figures General Guidelines for All Figures.
The Geological Society of London is the UK national society for geoscience, providing support to over 11, members in the UK and overseas. Founded in. Irvine T. and Rumble D. III () A writing guide for petrological (an other geological) manuscripts.
Journal of Petrology, 1–46, Oxford Univ. Press. 1 This document was blatantly scanned from a just-adequate photocopy of the original, run. Ethics of Peer Review: A Guide for Manuscript Reviewers Sara Rockwell, Ph.D. Departments of Therapeutic Radiology and Pharmacology, and Office of Scientific Affairs, Yale University School of Medicine, PO BoxNew Haven, CT Abstract The peer review of scientific manuscripts is a cornerstone of modern science and medicine.
Peer. Reviewer’s Guide for manuscripts submitted to Computers & Geosciences The following points help reviewers evaluate the content of C&G papers, and authors to develop C&G papers. Presentation issues (style and format as outlined in the Guide for. GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS (AND AUTHORS) Purpose of Peer Review The purpose of peer review for The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is twofold: 1) To evaluate objectively the science, and potential impact, of the submitted paper, and 2) To provide a constructive critique indicating how the paper could be or could have been improved by the authors.
McGraw-Hill Book Co. Stanldardl Handbook for Secretaries Several editions. These are excellent references for grammar and punctuation. TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF GEOLOGY The Florida Bureau of Geology is concerned not only with academic geological research, but also has statutory responsibilities to make surveys of.Malde, H.
E.,Guidelines for reviewers of Geological Manuscripts North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature,North American Stratigraphic Code USGS, (or later), Suggestions to Authors, USGS Profession Paper #?In addition to the members of the Editorial Board, the following were kind enough to serve, duringas reviewers of manuscripts submitted to Economic Geology for publication.